Fernando Cavallo vs Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Cavallo's ability to win points on the second serve slightly edges out Ambrogi, with a success rate of 44.99% compared to 44.24%. Could this grant Cavallo an advantage?
• In return games, Ambrogi captures a slightly better yield from opponents' second serves, winning 47.91% versus Cavallo's 46.46%. Does this make a difference in tight matches?
• Ambrogi exhibits stronger performance against first serves, capturing 32.76% of these points compared to Cavallo's 28.15%. How might this impact the match outcome?
• Cavallo excels at saving breakpoints, achieving a 58.82% save rate over Ambrogi’s 51.65%, potentially indicating resilience under pressure.
• Looking at win-loss records, Ambrogi outpaces Cavallo slightly with a 56.76% success rate in the past year, compared to Cavallo's 53.66% win rate.
• Each player has distinct surface preferences: Ambrogi shines on clay with a 61% win rate, while Cavallo fares better on indoor hard courts with a 50% win rate.
• Ambrogi competes mostly at a higher level in Challengers, presenting a tougher overall playing field, compared to Cavallo’s frequent participation in Futures events.
• Cavallo tends to face slightly more challenging opponents, with an average rival ranking of 326.2, while Ambrogi's opponents average a rank of 373.5.
• When matches extend to a deciding set, Cavallo triumphs 45% of the time, narrowly outpacing Ambrogi's 44% success rate.
• In breakpoint conversion, Ambrogi converts a higher percentage of opportunities at 39.39%, whereas Cavallo stands at 29.2%, possibly suggesting a greater proficiency in capitalizing on key moments.

Editorial Prediction (September 2, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent performances and key statistics, both players have shown notable strengths and weaknesses in various areas of the game. Cavallo displays a slight advantage in second serve performance, which could be pivotal in maintaining service games.

Ambrogi, however, showcases a superior return game, an area where they could capitalize against Cavallo. Their ability to handle first serve returns could pose a challenge to their opponent.

While Cavallo appears more adept under breakpoint pressure, Ambrogi's efficient conversion of breakpoint opportunities might counterbalance this, providing them with critical openings.

Both players have specific surface strengths, with Ambrogi favoring clay. However, current conditions of the match will play a crucial role in determining the outcome.

Considering the strengths, weaknesses, and recent trends, Ambrogi seems to have a slight edge and is the likely winner for this upcoming tennis match.